Composite vs Vinyl Decks vs Wood Deck
Designing a home or a property goes beyond the overall decision to structure it in particular ways as the mind finds most appealing. Features such as deck type and properties can go a long way in burgeoning the value of the property if handled correctly. Therefore, it is important to consider the best types of decks such as composite and vinyl decks before deciding.
Since time in memorial, wooden decks have held a special place in the hearts of many developers. However, modern advances in technology have led to the development of more virile decking types such as composite and vinyl decks. Although these decks have a more expensive upfront cost when compared to their wooden companion, they easily become more economical as the years roll by due to their drastically lower maintenance cost and heightened durability.
Before we delve too deep into the benefits of composite and vinyl decks in deciding which is best, it is important to consider what they actually are.
Composite decks are developed from wood waste and recycled plastics. It basically involves the extrusion of waste materials into valuable deck material.
Vinyl decks are entirely produced from plastics that are derived as a byproduct of petrochemical refining and are often called virgin vinyl.
Wood decks are the original decking materials and are often pressure treated and chemically infused to mitigate occurrences of insect and decay infestation, thus increasing its durability.
When comparing these three major decking types, what easily becomes noticeable is the different parameters on which they contest and some of these are listed below
Upfront material cost
This refers basically to the unit cost of the decking material per square area. Wood is the best in this parameter while composite has the highest cost.
This measures the level of environmental material savings the deck provides e.g. does it use recycled products or not. Composite decks have the highest score on this parameter, while the other deck types perform averagely.
Maintenance and repair cost
This refers to the cost incurred in keeping the deck in a functional state, feel and aesthetics. Both composites and vinyl decks have similarly good maintenance and repair costs while wood deck has poor (expensive) costs.
This refers to the ease of conversion of the deck material to suit individual developer’s or homeowner’s needs. Composite decks are the most flexible to work with. Desks can be attested to by most developers while the others perform averagely.
Longevity is the measure of how long the material is meant to last in years. Both composite and vinyl deck materials last the longest while wood decks perform poorly in comparison.
It easily becomes obvious that composite decks are the most sustainable and adaptable choices for homeowners. Developers that are not money conscious but are environmentally conscious. Also, vinyl decks are the best choices for people that are looking for affordability. However, the durable of decks that can serve them effectively for years to come.